FORESIGHT: Problems, Arguments, and Solutions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Diagonal arguments and fixed points
A universal schema for diagonalization was popularized by N.S. Yanofsky (2003), based on a pioneering work of F.W. Lawvere (1969), in which the existence of a (diagonolized-out and contradictory) object implies the existence of a fixed-point for a certain function. It was shown that many self-referential paradoxes and diagonally proved theorems can fit in that schema. Here, we fi...
متن کاملA strong convergence theorem for solutions of zero point problems and fixed point problems
Zero point problems of the sum of two monotone mappings and fixed point problems of a strictly pseudocontractive mapping are investigated. A strong convergence theorem for the common solutions of the problems is established in the framework of Hilbert spaces.
متن کاملQuantitative Macroeconomics Working Paper Series Solution of Perfect Foresight Saddlepoint Problems: a Simple Method and Applications Solution of Perfect Foresight Saddlepoint Problems: a Simple Method and Applications
Economists frequently connne themselves to the qualitative analysis of continuous optimization problems or they restrict their quantitative analysis to inaccurate methods like lineariza-tion around the steady state. The fact that the solution is characterized by an inherently unstable adjustment path arriving at a boundary value in innnite time, however, does not necessarily imply a complicated...
متن کاملRepresentation: Problems and Solutions
The current orthodoxy in cognitive science, what I describe as a commitment to deep representationalism, faces intractable problems. If we take these objections seriously, and I will argue that we should, there are two possible responses: 1. We are mistaken that representation is the locus of our cognitive capacities — we manage to be the successful cognitive agents in some other, non-represent...
متن کاملPro Arguments, Con Arguments and Status Quo Bias in Multi-Issue Decision Problems
The public faces a choice between two alternatives: the status quo and a “comprehensive reform” proposal that departs from the status quo in several dimensions. Deliberation over the problem takes the form of a public multi-issue debate. The “reformists” argue that the proposed reform satisfies desirable features lacked by the status quo. The status quo supporters counter-argue that some of the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Forensic Science International: Synergy
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2589-871X
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.06.017